Archive for January 1st, 2009

An Emergent View of the Enneagram

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

When I first met the Enneagram, I had a mixed reaction to it. I was excited to see how the insights of this map to the soul could be used for my own journey as well as in my ministry of preaching and direction. That excitement continues especially as I keep on digging deeper into it. In November, I was blessed to lead 23 others in catching some of this excitement and some of these insights. I have even received a few nice emails expressing gratitude for that day. That is very nice.

However, the mixed part of my reaction was the more extreme pathological approach that many of the authors I read used. Especially with my type (8). The descriptions seem to be very tilted toward the worst parts of our behavior. On the one hand these authors would be talking about the importance of avoiding the use of the Enneagram as a source of judgment, but then the very descriptions they use are pretty much all couched in terms of negativity. For my type, the descriptions talked about an extreme aggressive attitude toward people and the use and abuse of them for my own benefit. The descriptions would say something about the positive approach to things, but those descriptions of the strong protector would be overwhelmed by the dictatorial tyrant. It’s no wonder as I was trying out various type inventories my 8 score would often be 3rd or 4th in line.

At one level I can understand where that came from: many of those who have formulated the descriptions of the Enneagram in these first few generations were writing from the perspectives of diagnostitions who were used to viewing the pathology or unhealthy aspects of personality. In fact, Claudio Naranjo’s major contribution to the literature of the Enneagram connects the Enneatypes to the traditional categories of psychoses and neuroses (Enneagram Monthly, Susan Rhodes, Depathologizing the Enneagram).

For me, that only has limited attraction. As a preacher, teacher, and spiritual director, I am less interested in diagnosing the pathologies than I am more interested in what motivates us and can be resources for our wholeness and holiness. In the article above, as well as a couple others that I have read recently, there is a growing call for a new focus on the Enneagram. Susan Rhodes talks about Depathologizing the Enneagram, but we cannot truly remove the pathology, because those unhealthy parts of our being cannot be ignored.

Instead, I have been thinking about taking a cue from a movement within the church and even within systems theories of seeing the Emergent Qualities of the Enneagram.

I have found it very helpful to begin my thoughts and focus on the Essential Qualities and the Holy Ideas that the Enneagram points to. This is an approach that A. H. Almaas and Sandra Maitri have helped me to begin with. What is the presence of God/Essence/Life wanting to create within us, the unfold as an Emergence within our lives? Then we can place in its proper context where we get stuck and go astray. With that greater context it is easier for us to avail ourselves of that Emergent energy and those resources for wholeness to be more fully who we are already.

I have been spending a lot of time gathering in ideas related to the Enneagram and sorting through them to make them a part of me. Now I am going to start playing these ideas out. Feel free to enter the discussion.

FacebookGoogle BookmarksHotmailTwitterShare

Ways of Waiting

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

This last Sunday in worship we considered the witness of Anna and Simeon to waiting for the gift of God. And I am noticing that I have been focused on waiting for quite a while. This isn’t just an Advent thing, but something deeper in myself that is waiting for something. Not sure what that is at the moment, but the how of waiting is important to me personally in thie present moment.

In thinking about waiting there are a number of ways to wait that don’t work well.

The first way would be Anxious Waiting. At one level, we don’t think too much about saying that we are anxiously waiting for something to happen or someone to arrive. However, the core word is “anxiety.” This is a waiting that is colored with fear and doubt. We want to wait. We want the promise to be true. We want the awaited one to get here, but we aren’t sure. Our waiting is filled with Maybe. Maybe I was wrong. Maybe I missed it somehow. Maybe God really didn’t mean it. The uncertainty becomes acidic to the spirit as time lengthens between the promise given and the answer’s arrival.

One direction to go when the waiting time lengthens is what I call Imitation Patience. This is the empty appearance of waiting when one has given up. We have always been told that patience is a virtue and so even when we have given up on the hope of the awaited promise we still think we need to put up the appearance of patience. Yet, it is a sham. We get to the end of each day, we look back and see the lack of transformation and we think, “Just as I thought … nothing … again … and forever.”

Another response to the lengthening waiting time (which for many of us in our age of the Instant can be measured in nano-seconds) is to give up on waiting at all: impatience wins. This, too, is a giving up on the promise ever coming, but then takes over the reins. The thought comes to us that God’s not going to give us what we want (or what we think God wanted to do with us in the first place) so that means that we need to take care of things ourselves. We try to sanctify the impatience by saying that we are just giving God a hand in fulfilling God’s promise, but we betray our giving up on the promise when we become very certain about what God is supposed to be doing in our lives.

We can and do choose those ways of waiting quite often. And as time marches on and we are unable to see God’s promise fulfilled in our lives and world they become greater temptations. However, we are offered another way of waiting. This way is what Anna and Simeon witness to in the Gospel story.

I call this way of waiting Holy Anticipation. This way of waiting is grounded in faith in the promise given. Well, actually, it is more deeply grounded in the One who promises. And maybe that is a clue to how this way of waiting can be time-proof. The promise is one thing, but if we keep our lives grounded on trusting the One of Grace and Love who gave the promise then we can be more open and flexible to the variable forms the fulfillment brings. So certainty in the Promisor is one key to Holy Anticipation.

The other key is openness to whatever God wants to do in answering the promise. We get stuck when we think too specifically about how the promise will be answered. How often do we miss the gift offered to us because it didn’t come in the form we expected. I heard a retreat leader once define Expectation as “preconceived resentment.” I can imagine Simeon and Anna spending their lives going to Temple looking at each person that arrives and each family that brings in their children to be blessed wondering if this one is the promised one. Is this the Hope of Israel? Can this next one be the Consolation of Your people?

We are invited to enter into each new day with that kind of Holy Anticipation. God, is this your promise? What gracious and glorious thing are doing through this person, this event, this act of mine, this gift of another, etc.? Holy Anticipation is a completely open heart that with certainty looks for how God is using each moment of each day for our good and God’s glory.

FacebookGoogle BookmarksHotmailTwitterShare